![]() Two other justices pointed out that other provisions of the Constitution don’t appear to include the president when they refer to federal officers, pushing back on a key pillar of the challengers’ case. “Why not include president and vice president? … They spelled out senator or representative.” ![]() “If it was so important that the president be included, I come back to the question, why not spell it out?” Justice Carlos Samour asked a lawyer for the challengers. However, she also ruled that the 14th Amendment’s disqualification clause doesn’t apply to Trump because the provision doesn’t mention the presidency. They are reviewing a ruling from Colorado District Judge Sarah Wallace, who presided over a bench trial last month, and concluded that Trump “engaged in an insurrection” on January 6, 2021. The Colorado justices grappled with a key question: Does the ban apply to presidents? But so far, these cases have fallen flat, keeping Trump on the ballot in Minnesota, Arizona, Michigan and elsewhere. A new suit was filed Wednesday in Oregon during the Colorado hearing. With support from bipartisan legal scholars, liberal groups filed lawsuits across the country to enforce the 14th Amendment’s insurrectionist ban. The justices didn’t say when they will issue their decision, which is expected to be appealed to the US Supreme Court, no matter which way they rule. The seven-member court appeared divided at times, pushing back on arguments from both Trump and the challengers who want to remove him from Colorado’s presidential ballot in 2024. The Colorado Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday in a closely watched case about whether the US Constitution’s ban on insurrectionists holding public office applies to former President Donald Trump because of the January 6, 2021, US Capitol riot. Read more about the oral arguments in the posts below. The Colorado ruling is the latest legal victory for the GOP frontrunner, who has now defended his spot on the ballot in several key states ahead of the 2024 primary season, including in Michigan and Minnesota, though appeals are underway.In the hearing, some justices focused on the vagueness of the amendment, in what would be good news for the former president, as anti-Trump challengers argued the insurrectionist ban is a "self-defense mechanism" against threats to democracy.The judge, however, rejected removing the former president from the state’s 2024 primary ballot, finding that the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” doesn’t apply to presidents. Trump’s team and the group trying to remove him from the Colorado 2024 ballot appealed different parts of a lower-court ruling, which found Trump “engaged in an insurrection” on January 6, 2021.The Colorado Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday on appeals to a 14th Amendment challenge to former President Donald Trump’s candidacy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |